Richard Sohappy v. McKee A. Smith, United States of America v. State of Oregon, Richard Sohappy v. State of Washington, United States of America v. State of Washington, Richard Sohappy v. McKee A. Smith, United States of America v. State of Oregon

529 F.2d 570 Richard SOHAPPY et al., Appellees, v. McKee A. SMITH et al., Appellants. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. STATE OF OREGON et al., Appellants. Richard SOHAPPY et al., Appellees, v. STATE OF WASHINGTON, Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. STATE OF WASHINGTON, Appellant. Richard SOHAPPY et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. McKee A. SMITH et al., Defendants-Appellants. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. STATE OF OREGON et al., Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 75--2409, 74--2376 and 74--2617. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Jan. 28, 1976. James B. Hovis (argued), Yakima, Wash., Owen M. Panner (argued), Panner, Johnson, Marceau & Karnopp, Bend, Or., for appellees. Lee Johnson, Atty. Gen. (argued), State of Or., Portland, Or., James M. Johnson, Asst. Atty. Gen. (argued), State of Wash., Olympia, Wash., Carl Strass, Atty. (argued), Land and Natural Resources Section, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for appellants. Tony Schwab (argued), Seattle, Wash., for intervenor Columbia River Fishermen. OPINION Before HUFSTEDLER and WRIGHT, Circuit Judges, and LINDBERG, * District Judge. PER CURIAM: 1 On July 8, 1969, the district…