EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. OCCIDENTAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA, Defendant-Appellee

Good Law
535 F.2d 533·11 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 10,954·12 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1300·1976 U.S. App. LEXIS 11407
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 11, 197675-1705California4,180 words

Opinion

Opinion

Wright, J.

In this Title VII action the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) appeals from the district court’s order of dismissal. We reverse and remand.

I.

PROCEEDINGS BELOW

On December 27, 1970, Tamar Edelson filed with the EEOC a charge against Occidental Life Insurance Company (Occidental), alleging that she had been discriminated against because of her sex. She specified that “the most recent date on which this discrimination took place” was October 1, 1970, the date of her discharge by Occidental.

The EEOC referred the charge to the California Fair Employment Practices Commission, in accordance with the provisions of Section 706(c) [42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(c)]. When that agency took no action, the charge was formally filed with the EEOC on March 9, 1971.

The EEOC undertook an investigation and, on February 25, 1972, its District Director issued Findings of Fact that Occidental had discriminated against Ms. Edelson and also had discriminated against many other employees through a variety of practices and policies. Occidental filed exceptions to the findings on March 23, 1972. The EEOC issued its “Reasonable Cause” Determination on February 8,1973 and during the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.