United States v. Arnold Gemmill

Good Law
535 F.2d 1145
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 20, 197674-2809, 74-2965, 74-3062, 75-1019 to 75-1022California1,872 words

Opinion

Opinion

Hufstedler, J.

Appellant Indians challenge their convictions for theft of government property and for illegal occupancy of a national forest. Their consolidated appeals can be divided into two categories: the timber cases and the trespass cases.

On November 8, 1973, the three appellants in the timber cases cut and carried away Christmas trees from the Shasta Trin ity National Forest. They claimed authority to do so under an authorization from the Pit River Indian Tribe, of which they are members and which, they contend, has Indian title to the land in question. Appellants were charged under 18 U.S.C. § 641 with theft of government property valued at less than $100. Two of the appellants received the maximum sentence of one year imprisonment and the third, Pete Wilson, was sentenced to an indeterminate term under the Federal Youth Corrections Act, 18 U.S.C. § 5010 (b).

The trespass appellants were charged with illegal occupancy of the Lassen National Forest following the issuance of closure orders by the Forest Supervisor. The alleged trespasses occurred in December 1972 and December 1973. In both instances, the reason given for the closure order was to avoid a confrontation between…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.