In Re Crateo, Inc., Bankrupt. Crateo, Inc. v. Intermark, Inc.

Bad Law
536 F.2d 862
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 28, 197673-3208, 74-2088, 74-2615 and 75-3061California3,923 words

Opinion

Opinion

Wollenberg, J.

Crateo, Inc., a California corporation, was in the business of purchasing “sick” companies. Its own health came into question in late summer of 1970, and its creditors initiated involuntary bankruptcy proceedings. After a jury trial on the question of its ability to pay its debts, Crateo was adjudicated a bankrupt. While appeal from that judgment was pending, Crateo requested permission from the trial court to take depositions pursuant to Rule 27(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. While its original appeal was still pending, Crateo also filed in the trial court two motions to vacate the adjudication of bankruptcy under Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Appeals from the denial of all three post-judgment motions were consolidated with the primary appeal. Finding no merit in any of appellant’s arguments, we affirm the adjudication of bankruptcy and decline to remand the case for any further proceedings.

I. Adjudication of Bankruptcy

In the summer of 1970, Crateo elected to wind up its affairs and voluntarily dissolve. On August 31, 1970, it filed a petition for judicial supervision of the winding up process with the Superior Court of the State of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.