Spangler v. Pasadena City Board Of Education

Good Law
537 F.2d 1031
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 25, 197675--1714California3,697 words

Opinion

Opinion

537 F.2d 1031 Nancy Anne SPANGLER, by her father and next friend, James E. Spangler, Jr., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, and United States of America, Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellee, v. PASADENA CITY BOARD OF EDUCATION et al., Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 74--2530, 75--1714. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. May 25, 1976. Lee G. Paul (argued), of Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker, Los Angeles, Cal., Charles B. Johnson, Pasadena, Cal., for defendants-appellants. Fred Okrand (argued), of ACLU Foundation of Southern Cal., Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiffs-appellees. Neal J. Tonken (argued), Atty., U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for intervenor-appellee. OPINION Before CHAMBERS and WALLACE, Circuit Judges, and JAMESON, District Judge. CHAMBERS, Circuit Judge. 1 This is another chapter in Pasadena, California, school desegregation ordered by the District Court, Spangler v. Pasadena City Board of Education, 519 F.2d 430 (9th Cir. 1975), certiorari, 423 U.S. 945 , 96 S.Ct. 355 , 46 L.Ed.2d 276 , 44 U.S.L.W. 3271 (1976) granted. The reported case gives the background. 2 Part of the original plan provided rules for selecting school administrators to give…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.