United States v. Amado Martinez-Fuerte, United States of America v. Jose Jiminez-Garcia, United States of America v. Raymond Rangel Guillen and Fernando Medrano-Barragan

538 F.2d 858 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Amado MARTINEZ-FUERTE, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jose JIMINEZ-GARCIA, Defendant-Appellee. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Raymond RANGEL GUILLEN and Fernando Medrano-Barragan, Defendants-Appellees. Nos. 74-2462, 74-2680, 74-2714. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. July 20, 1976. 1 Jack Robinson, Asst. U. S. Atty. (argued), San Diego, Cal., for the U. S. 2 Charles M. Sevilla (argued), of Federal Defenders of San Diego, Inc., San Diego, Cal., for appellant Martinez-Fuerte. 3 Frank M. Mangan (argued), of Federal Defenders of San Diego, Inc., San Diego, Cal., for appellee Jiminez-Garcia. 4 Michael J. McCabe of Federal Defenders of San Diego, Inc., and E. J. Boone, San Diego, Cal., for appellees Rangel Guillen and Medrano-Barragan. ORDER 5 Before DUNIWAY and CARTER, Circuit Judges, and WEIGEL, District Judge. 6 Pursuant to the judgment of the Supreme Court of the United States in United States v. Martinez-Fuerte et al., 1976, --- U.S. ----, 96 S.Ct. 3074 , 48 L.Ed.2d ---, it is ordered: 7 1. In No. 74-2462, the conviction of the appellant…