United States v. Darrell Calhoun, United States of America v. Andrew Sheppard, United States of America v. Joe T. Harris, United States of America v. James E. Ellis, United States of America v. Clifford Burston, United States of America v. James William Wimbley, United States of America v. Calvin Stephenson

Good Law
542 F.2d 1094
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 4, 197675-1376California5,797 words

Opinion

Opinion

542 F.2d 1094 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Darrell CALHOUN, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Andrew SHEPPARD, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Joe T. HARRIS, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James E. ELLIS, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Clifford BURSTON, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James William WIMBLEY, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Calvin STEPHENSON, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 75-1519, 75-1376, 75-2904, 75-1541, 75-1493, 75-1492 and 75-1368. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Sept. 24, 1976. Rehearing Denied in No. 75-1519 Nov. 4, 1976. S. G. Jackson, Jr., Deputy Federal Public Defender (argued), Los Angeles, Cal., for Wimbley. Arthur Mabry, Los Angeles, Cal., for Sheppard. Leonard C. Kohn, Los Angeles, Cal., for Calhoun. Alan Fenster (argued), Beverly Hills, Cal., for Harris. Ron Minkin, Los Angeles, Cal., for Ellis. David Elson (argued), Murphy, Thornton, Hinerfeld & Cahill, Los Angeles, Cal., for Burston. Donald…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.