Javelin Corporation v. Uniroyal, Inc.

Good Law
546 F.2d 276
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 13, 197775-1481California1,835 words

Opinion

Opinion

Carter, J.

This is a private antitrust action alleging violations of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1 . Plaintiff Javelin Corporation appeals from a district court order granting summary judgment to appellees. We reverse in part and affirm in part.

Facts

In 1962, Tire Brands, Inc. was founded by a group of tire distributors for the purpose of pooling their purchasing power. Tire Brands purchased tires primarily from Uniroyal, which participated in the organization of Tire Brands and produced a tire tradenamed “Sonic” for it. Member distributors were obligated to purchase a minimum quota of tires from Uniroyal to ensure continuous volume purchasing. They also were required to limit their sales to the exclusive territories assigned to them under the group agreement. Sanctions were imposed to enforce these arrangements.

Javelin was founded in 1967 as a wholesaler of tires. Shortly thereafter, Javelin contacted Tire Brands with a view toward obtaining membership. Javelin initially was poorly capitalized and could not finance its own private brand, thereby necessitating its membership in some form of purchasing group with an identified brand of tires. Javelin was admitted into Tire Brands in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.