United States v. James Junior Finch

Bad Law
548 F.2d 822
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 3, 197775-2149California7,863 words

Opinion

Opinion

Kennedy, J.

This case began when James Junior Finch stood on a bank of the Big Horn River and cast a fishing lure into the waters. He was charged by information with trespassing on Indian lands, a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1165 . The bank and the bed of the Big Horn River at the point where Finch stood lie within the exterior boundaries of the Crow Indian Reservation. All concede that the State of Montana owns the bank at that spot, having acquired the property by purchase. The state’s chain of title can be traced to a Crow Indian who acquired the land by allotment.

Finch held a fishing license issued by the Montana State Fish and Game Commission. However, he was not a member of the Crow Tribe, and he was well aware of an ordinance promulgated by the tribe that forbade all persons who were not tribal members from entering Crow lands for fishing. The district court found that no entry had been made on Indian land and dismissed the information. 395 F.Supp. 205 (D.Mont. 1975). The Government appeals.

The court below originally denied a motion by the defendant to dismiss the information. The Government and the defendant stipulated to an “Agreed Statement of Facts” and submitted the case for the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.