United States v. Hodge And Zweig

Good Law
548 F.2d 1347·39 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 940·1977 U.S. App. LEXIS 14719
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 16, 197774-3374California4,262 words

Opinion

Opinion

548 F.2d 1347 77-1 USTC P 9263 UNITED STATES of America, and Richard Christopher, Special Agent, Plaintiffs- Appellees, v. HODGE AND ZWEIG, a partnership, Richard A. Hodge, a partner, and Robert M. Zweig, a partner, Defendants-Appellants. No. 74-3374. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Feb. 16, 1977. Halinan, Blum, Grode, argued, San Francisco, Cal., for defendants-appellants. Gary K. Shelton, Asst. U. S. Atty., San Francisco, Cal., Charles E. Brookhart, argued, App. Section, Tax Div., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., for plaintiffs-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. Before BROWNING, Chief Judge, and SMITH * and KENNEDY, Circuit Judges. OPINION KENNEDY, Circuit Judge: 1 The principal issues on this appeal are whether information demanded by an Internal Revenue Service subpoena is protected by the attorney-client privilege, by the fifth amendment privilege against self-incrimination, or by the rule which prohibits issuance of an IRS summons for an improper purpose. 2 Messrs. Richard A. Hodge and Robert M. Zweig, appellants here, are both members of the State Bar of California and are partners in the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.