United States v. Spagnuolo

Good Law
549 F.2d 705·1977 U.S. App. LEXIS 14453
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 4, 197776-2463California3,893 words

Opinion

Opinion

549 F.2d 705 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Attilio Joe SPAGNUOLO, Thomas Guy Guglielmi, Charles Francis Leahy, Kenneth Whiteman, Reginald Frederick Sutter, Howard Arthur Swann, Michael Joseph Saunders, Raymond Zachary Cohn, Stephen Cosenza, Armando Cosenza, Laurie Anderson Rossetti, Gloria Spagnuolo, and Harvey Lee Ubhoff, Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 76-2372, 76-2037, 76-2059, 76-2060, 76-2061, 76-2062, 76-2181, 76-2458, 76-2459, 76-2460, 76-2461, 76-2462 and 76-2463. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. March 4, 1977. James F. Hewitt, Federal Public Defender, George L. Cooke, Edward B. Collins, Jerrold M. Ladar, George J. Engler, San Francisco, Cal., for defendants-appellants. James L. Browning, Jr., U. S. Atty., John C. Emerson, Sp. Atty., U. S. Dept. of Justice, San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. Before BARNES, DUNIWAY and SNEED, Circuit Judges. OPINION SNEED, Circuit Judge: 1 This opinion marks the second time these parties have appeared before us to dispute the legality of evidence derived from a series of wiretaps authorized pursuant to 18 U.S.C.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.