United States v. Luttetus Perry, A/K/A Ted Perry, United States of America v. Warren Stephen Bradley, United States of America v. Theodore Ware, A/K/A "Teed" A/K/A "Fish", United States of America v. Brian Winters, United States of America v. Michael Burke Erwin
Opinion
Opinion
550 F.2d 524 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Luttetus PERRY, a/k/a Ted Perry, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Warren Stephen BRADLEY, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Theodore WARE, a/k/a "Teed" a/k/a "Fish", Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Brian WINTERS, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael Burke ERWIN, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 75-3737, 75-3743, 75-3738, 76-1314 and 75-3662. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. March 22, 1977. Stephen W. Peterson, Asst. U. S. Atty., argued, San Diego, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee. Edward F. Bell, argued, Bell, Gage, McSorley & Hudson, Detroit, Mich., for appellant Perry. Howard J. Bechefsky, argued, San Diego, Cal., for appellant Ware. Gary Ellingson, argued, San Diego, Cal., for appellant Bradley. James N. Pendleton, argued, San Diego, Cal., for appellant Winters. Before ELY and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges, and SOLOMON, * District Judge. J. BLAINE ANDERSON, Circuit Judge: 1 On August 15, 1975, the Federal Grand Jury for the Southern District of California returned a…