In re Automobile Antitrust Cases I and II

Caution
1 Cal. App. 5th 127·2016 Cal. App. LEXIS 546·204 Cal. Rptr. 3d 330
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 5, 2016A134913California19,784 words

Opinion

Opinion

Reardon, J.

—In this coordinated proceeding, certain purchasers of new automobiles in California (plaintiffs) brought state law claims against a number of automobile manufacturers and dealer associations under the Cartwright Act (Bus. & Prof. Code, §§ 16720-16728) and the unfair competition law (Bus. & Prof. Code, §§ 17200-17210). Specifically, plaintiffs allege that defendant manufacturers and associations conspired to keep lower priced, yet virtually identical, new cars from being exported from Canada to the United States, thereby keeping new vehicle prices in California higher than they would have been in a properly competitive market. After years of litigation, the trial court granted summary judgment in favor of the two remaining defendants in the case—Ford Motor Company (Ford U.S.) and its subsidiary, Ford Motor Company of Canada, Ltd. (Ford Canada) (collectively, Ford)—concluding that plaintiffs had failed to produce sufficient evidence of an actual agreement among Ford and the other manufacturers to restrict the export of new vehicles from Canada to the United States.

On appeal, plaintiffs challenge the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Ford, arguing that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.