Miller v. People Of The State Of California

Good Law
551 F.2d 1168·1977 U.S. App. LEXIS 13897
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 11, 197775-1384California433 words

Opinion

Opinion

551 F.2d 1168 Marvin MILLER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PEOPLE OF the STATE OF CALIFORNIA, James Musick, Sheriff of the County of Orange, Cecil Hicks, District Attorney for the County of Orange, the Municipal Court of the County of Orange, Harbor Judicial District, Defendants-Appellees. No. 75-1384. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. April 11, 1977. Burton Marks, Los Angeles, Cal., argued, for plaintiff-appellant. Evelle J. Younger, Atty. Gen., Frederick R. Millar, Deputy Atty. Gen., Los Angeles, Cal., Cecil Hicks, Jr., Dist. Atty., Oretta D. Sears and Cliff Harris, argued, Deputy Dist. Attys., Santa Ana, Cal., for defendants-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California. Before CHAMBERS and ELY, Circuit Judges, and SOLOMON, * District Judge. PER CURIAM: 1 For the background of this obscenity case, one should examine Miller v. California, 413 U.S. 15 , 93 S.Ct. 2607 , 37 L.Ed.2d 419 (1973) and Miller v. California, 418 U.S. 915 , 94 S.Ct. 3206 , 41 L.Ed.2d 1158 (1974) (Miller II ). 2 After Miller II was decided, Miller came to the United States District Court for the Central District of California with a petition for habeas…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.