13 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1360, 14 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 7575 Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Hearst Corporation, Seattle Post-Intelligencer Division

Good Law
553 F.2d 579
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 20, 197775-1123California1,046 words

Opinion

Opinion

553 F.2d 579 13 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. 1360 , 14 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 7575 EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HEARST CORPORATION, SEATTLE POST-INTELLIGENCER DIVISION, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 75-1123. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. June 30, 1976. As Amended April 20, 1977. Lutz Alexander Prager, Atty., EEOC, San Francisco, Cal., argued, for plaintiff-appellant. David B. Goldstein, Seattle, Wash., argued, for defendants-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington. Before CHAMBERS and GOODWIN, Circuit Judges, and SWEIGERT, * District Judge. PER CURIAM: 1 This civil action is brought by EEOC against Post-Intelligencer pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 USC § 2000e, et seq., as amended. 2 The appeal is from a District Court order dismissing the complaint, which was for injunctive relief, insofar as it alleged discrimination against women and discrimination against minority groups upon the ground that the original EEOC charge by a white male alleged only discrimination against him. 3 The main question is whether and, if so, to what extent a civil action,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.