Sec v. Commodity Options International, Inc.

Good Law
553 F.2d 628
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 10, 197775-2385California3,615 words

Opinion

Opinion

553 F.2d 628 Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,072 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. COMMODITY OPTIONS INTERNATIONAL, INC., a California Corporation, Double Option Systems, Inc., a California Corporation, Josef Rotter, Individually and as president and director of Commodity Options International, Inc., and Double Option Systems, Inc., C. R. Richmond & Co., a California Corporation, and Curtis R. Richmond, Individually and as president and director of C. R. Richmond & Co., Defendants-Appellants. No. 75-2385. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. May 10, 1977. Darrell L. Johnson, Lindholm & Johnson, Los Angeles, Cal., for defendants-appellants. David Ferber, Frederic T. Spindel, Howard B. Scherer, Attys., Securities Exchange Commission, Washington, D. C., Charles R. Hartman, III, Los Angeles, Cal., argued for plaintiff-appellee. On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California. Before MERRILL, ELY and CHOY, Circuit Judges. MERRILL, Circuit Judge: 1 The sole question presented by this appeal is whether naked double options to buy and sell commodity futures contracts are investment contracts and thus are…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.