Estate of James R. Lowe, Deceased. Crocker National Bank, James R. Lowe, Jr. And Margot H. Lowe, Co-Executors v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Good Law
555 F.2d 244·40 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 6212·1977 U.S. App. LEXIS 13104
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 3, 197776-2105California413 words

Opinion

Opinion

The sole issue on appeal is whether the Tax Court erred in finding that the value of certain property transferred in trust is in-cludable in the gross estate of decedent James Lowe as having been transferred by him “in contemplation of death” within the meaning of the former version of Int.Rev. Code of 1954, § 2035. We affirm.

Since the property was transferred for less than adequate consideration within three years of Lowe’s death, it is presumed to have been transferred in contemplation of death “unless shown to the contrary.” Id. % 2035(b). See First Nat’l Bank v. United States, 488 F.2d 575, 576 (9th Cir. 1973); Estate of Compton v. C. I. R, 532 F.2d 1086, 1087 (6th Cir. 1976); Berman v. United States, 487 F.2d 70, 72 (5th Cir. 1973). The Tax Court held that the estate had not met its burden of proving to the contrary, and it found that the transfer in trust was made by Lowe “in contemplation of death.” See Allen v. Trust Co., 326 U.S. 630, 635-36 , 66 S.Ct. 389 , 90 L.Ed. 367 (1946); United States v. Wells, 283 U.S. 102, 115-20 , 51 S.Ct. 446 , 75 L.Ed. 867 (1931); Gillette’s Estate v. C. I. R, 182 F.2d 1010, 1015 (9th Cir. 1950). Having given due consideration to the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.