Santa Clara Valley Distributing Co., Inc. v. Pabst Brewing Company

Good Law
556 F.2d 942·23 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 1174·1977 U.S. App. LEXIS 12665
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 29, 197775-1513California2,143 words

Opinion

Opinion

556 F.2d 942 1977-2 Trade Cases 61,537 SANTA CLARA VALLEY DISTRIBUTING CO., INC., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. PABST BREWING COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee. No. 75-1513. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. June 29, 1977. J. Albert Hutchinson (argued), San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiffs-appellants. James R. Madison (argued), Orrick, Herrington, Rowley & Sutcliffe, San Francisco, Cal., for defendant-appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. Before DUNIWAY and CHOY, Circuit Judges, and BONSAL, * District Judge. PER CURIAM: 1 Plaintiffs appeal the trial court's grant of defendant's motion for a directed verdict. Fed.R.Civ.P. 50(a). We affirm. 2 Plaintiffs Santa Clara Valley Distributing Co., Inc. and Bert G. Gianelli are wholesale distributors for various brands of beer in California. Defendant Pabst Brewing Company (Pabst) is a manufacturer and seller of beer. Plaintiffs have written distributorship agreements with Pabst to wholesale its products. 3 Of the plethora of antitrust claims raised in plaintiffs' original and amended complaints, only two theories were reserved for trial: 4 (1) Did defendant combine or…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.