Earl D. Wimberly v. Stanley J. Rogers

Good Law
557 F.2d 671·1977 U.S. App. LEXIS 12453
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 15, 197775-2239California1,140 words

Opinion

Opinion

Barnes, J.

On January 2, 1975, plaintiff-appellant, a California State prisoner, filed a civil rights complaint against certain state correctional, and other officers, of the State of Montana ( 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1985). He moved for appointment of counsel to represent him, and the right to sue in forma pauperis. The first motion was denied; the second was granted, each on the day they were filed.

The 82 paragraph complaint is a typical propria persona document. Various motions to dismiss were filed by certain defendants on various grounds. Motion for summary judgment “interlocutory in character” was made by certain defendants, as well as two motions for stay of proceedings by defendants. Appellant made several motions for default judgment (one was granted, later to be set aside because that defendant had previously filed an answer), and motions to strike certain defendant’s answers.

On April 15,1975, Judge Smith signed an order denying Wimberly’s Motion for Appointment of Counsel, requiring that all Interrogatories and Requests for Admission and Production be filed by July 1,1975, and staying all further proceedings “until Wimberly is released from custody and able to personally attend…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.