Richard Stypmann v. The City and County of San Francisco

Good Law
557 F.2d 1338·1977 U.S. App. LEXIS 12369
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 21, 197774-1844California3,820 words

Opinion

Opinion

Browning, J.

Appellees filed this class action under the Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1983 , against officials of the City and County of San Francisco, California, a garage owner in San Francisco, a garage owner in Sausalito, California, and the president of the San Francisco Tow Car Association. Appellees challenged the constitutionality of the provisions of the California Vehicle Code authorizing removal of privately owned vehicles from streets and highways without pri- or notice or opportunity for hearing, and of section 22851 establishing a possessory lien for towage and storage fees without a hearing before or after the lien attaches.

In the course of the litigation, appellees abandoned their attack upon those provisions of the Vehicle Code authorizing the initial seizure and tow without a prior hearing, and confined their objection to the provision of section 22851 creating a possessory lien for towing and storage charges. Their complaint was then dismissed as to the city officials.

Also in the course of the litigation, and apparently in response to it, the City and County of San Francisco adopted an ordinance providing that a person “unable to pay” towage fees may obtain a hearing on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.