United States v. Doney

Good Law
559 F.2d 544·40 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5684·1977 U.S. App. LEXIS 11941
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 18, 197776-2138California270 words

Opinion

Opinion

559 F.2d 544 77-2 USTC P 9626 UNITED STATES of America and Richard W. Le Bar, Special Agent, Internal Revenue Service, Petitioners-Appellees, v. Paul DONEY, as President of Paul's Automobile Sales, Inc., Paul's Automobile Sales, Inc., James E. Ordowski, and Harold P. Conner, Respondents-Appellants. No. 76-2138. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Aug. 18, 1977. Clyde R. Maxwell, Newport Beach, Cal., submitted briefs for respondents-appellants. Lawrence Semenza, U. S. Atty., Reno, Nev., Scott P. Crampton, M. Carr Ferguson, Asst. Attys. Gen., U. S. Dept. of Justice, Tax Div., Crombie J. D. Garrett and Carleton D. Powell, Attys., Washington, D. C., for petitioners-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada. Before BROWNING, KOELSCH and SNEED, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: 1 The district court properly ordered enforcement of the IRS summons. 2 The only circumstances relied upon to establish abuse of process was that prior to the filing of the petition for enforcement only special agents of the Intelligence Division of the IRS appeared in the investigation. That fact alone is not enough to carry the taxpayer's burden of showing that the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.