Earl B. Collins, and Cross-Appellants v. Donald H. Rumsfeld, and Cross-Appellees, and Other Consolidated Cases

Good Law
559 F.2d 1178
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 25, 197775-2967California227 words

Opinion

Opinion

559 F.2d 1178 Earl B. COLLINS et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees and Cross-Appellants, v. Donald H. RUMSFELD et al., Defendants-Appellants and Cross-Appellees, and other consolidated cases. Nos. 75-2935, 75-2967, 75-3238, 75-3348, 75-3432 and 75-3559. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Aug. 25, 1977. Eric A. Seitz, Honolulu, Hawaii, argued for appellees in 75-2935 and for appellants in 75-2967. Scott J. Tepper, Los Angeles, Cal., argued for appellees in 75-2935, 75-3238, 75-3432 & 75-3559, and for appellants in 75-2967 & 75-3348. Neil H. Koslowe, Atty., U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., argued for appellees in 75-2967 & 75-3348, and for appellants in 75-2935, 75-3238, 75-3432 & 75-3559. Before CHAMBERS and SNEED, Circuit Judges, and SWEIGERT * , District Judge. PER CURIAM: 1 Our previous decision in this consolidated appeal, Collins v. Rumsfeld, 542 F.2d 1109 (9th Cir. 1976), was vacated and remanded to us by the Supreme Court "for further consideration in light of United States v. Larionoff, 431 U.S. ----, 97 S.Ct. 2150 , 53 L.Ed.2d 48 (1977)." Saylors v. United States, --- U.S. ----, 97 S.Ct. 2945 , 53 L.Ed.2d ---- (1977), vacating Collins v.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.