National Labor Relations Board v. R. O. Pyle Roofing Co.
Opinion
Opinion
560 F.2d 1370 96 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2680 , 82 Lab.Cas. P 10,164 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. R. O. PYLE ROOFING CO., Robert Dixon d/b/a Custom Roofing, Deloris Terhaar and Marvin Terhaar d/b/a Inland Empire Roofers, Respondents. No. 76-2274. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Sept. 15, 1977. Richard A. Cohen, N.L.R.B., Washington, D. C., argued for petitioner. Stanley R. Schultz, Spokane, Wash., argued for respondents. On Petition to Enforce an Order of the National Labor Relations board. Before MERRILL and WRIGHT, Circuit Judges, and JAMESON, Senior District Judge. * PER CURIAM: 1 The Board petitions for enforcement of an order entered after a finding that Pyle Roofing Co. committed an unfair labor practice in refusing to adhere to a collective bargaining agreement negotiated on its behalf by a multi-employer association to which it had assigned its "bargaining rights." The Board held that the refusal constituted violations of § 8(a)(5) and (1) of the Act, 29 U.S.C. § 158 (a)(5) and (1). 222 NLRB No. 119 . We enforce the Board's order. 2 Pyle Roofing joined the Inland Empire Roofing Contractors Association, with offices in Spokane, Washington,…