Richmond Elks Hall Association v. Richmond Redevelopment Agency and the City of Richmond, (Richmond Redevelopment Agency, Appellant.) Richmond Elks Hall Association v. Richmond Redevelopment Agency and the City of Richmond

Good Law
561 F.2d 1327·1977 U.S. App. LEXIS 11343
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 30, 197718-35164California3,894 words

Opinion

Opinion

561 F.2d 1327 RICHMOND ELKS HALL ASSOCIATION, Plaintiff, v. RICHMOND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY and the City of Richmond, Defendants, (Richmond Redevelopment Agency, Appellant.) RICHMOND ELKS HALL ASSOCIATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. RICHMOND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY and the City of Richmond, Defendants. Nos. 75-2520 and 75-2491. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Sept. 30, 1977. Ronald J. Mulcare (argued), Turner & Mulcare, San Mateo, Cal., Bold and Polisner, Walnut Creek, Cal., Jackson and Gughemetti, Burlingame, Cal., for Richmond Elks Hall Assn. William R. Edgar (argued), Herman H. Fitzgerald, Fitzgerald, Johnson, Berg and Edgar, San Francisco, Cal., for Richmond Redevelopment Agency. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. Before CHAMBERS and TRASK, Circuit Judges, and THOMPSON, * District Judge. TRASK, Circuit Judge: 1 This case involves an appeal by Richmond Redevelopment Agency (Agency) from a final judgment of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, ordering Agency to pay to Richmond Elks Hall Association (Elks) a certain sum of money as just compensation for a de facto taking in inverse…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.