United States v. George Ernst Von Der Linden, Jr.

Good Law
561 F.2d 1340·1977 U.S. App. LEXIS 11317
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 3, 197777-1275California444 words

Opinion

Opinion

Appellant was convicted of the use of an interstate communication in an attempt to extort $25,000.00. 18 U.S.C. § 875 (d). Appellant threatened to reveal facts damaging to the reputation of another person unless he was paid $25,000.00. In the same conversation, he also defamed the character of a friend; these allegations were unrelated to the extortion attempt.

At trial, appellant denied he intended to extort money, explaining the conversation as an emotional quarrel. The jury apparently disbelieved this explanation. On appeal, he contends evidence showing the truth of the aforementioned allegations should have been admitted by the trial judge.

[L2] As a general rule, the truth of damaging allegations underlying a threat to injure the reputation of another is no defense to a charge of extortion. Wilson v. Oklahoma (Okl.Cr.1957), 306 P.2d 717, 731 ; State v. Harrington, 128 Vt. 242 , 260 A.2d 692 (1969). See also, Keys v. United States, 126 F.2d 181 (8th Cir. 1942), cert. denied, 316 U.S. 694 , 62 S.Ct. 1296 , 86 L.Ed. 1764 (1942); United States v. Pignatelli, 125 F.2d 643 (2d Cir. 1942), cert. denied, 316 U.S. 680 , 62 S.Ct. 1269 , 86 L.Ed. 1754 (1942). The language of § 875(d)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.