Geoffrey Raymond Peter Norman Valentine v. Aetna Insurance Company, Geoffrey Raymond Peter Norman Valentine v. Continental Casualty Company, Geoffrey Raymond Peter Norman Valentine v. Royal Globe Insurance Company

Good Law
564 F.2d 292·1977 U.S. App. LEXIS 10899
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 7, 197775-1721California2,810 words

Opinion

Opinion

564 F.2d 292 Geoffrey Raymond Peter Norman VALENTINE, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. AETNA INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant. Geoffrey Raymond Peter Norman VALENTINE, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant. Geoffrey Raymond Peter Norman VALENTINE, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ROYAL GLOBE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 75-1721, 75-1734 and 75-2152. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Nov. 7, 1977. 1 David Gordon (argued), of Bronson, Bronson & McKinnon, Peter W. Fisher (argued), of Maloney, Chase, Fisher & Hurst, San Francisco, Cal., Robert Lee (argued), of Rust & Armenis, Sacramento, Cal., for defendants-appellants. 2 Harlow P. Rothert (argued), of Hancock, Rothert & Bunshoft, San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee. 3 Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. 4 Before BROWNING and TRASK, Circuit Judges, and PREGERSON, District Judge. * PREGERSON, District Judge: 5 These consolidated appeals are from a judgment apportioning responsibility among four insurance companies for the payment of a personal injury judgment. 6 Bay Area Contractors, Inc. (Bay), a general…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.