Briley v. State Of California

Good Law
564 F.2d 849·1977 U.S. App. LEXIS 11131
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 19, 197775-2753California5,050 words

Opinion

Opinion

564 F.2d 849 Ronald Warren BRILEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, County of San Diego, Ronald Abernathy, Charles M. Snell, Jr., Earl B. Gilliam, Claude B. Brown, T. Bruce Iredale, Robert J. Stahl, Gerald F. Banks, Harry W. Depew, Doctors Hospital, et al., Defendants- Appellees. No. 75-2753. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Oct. 19, 1977. Hugh B. Fielder, Fielder & Fielder, North Hollywood, Cal., argued for plaintiff-appellant. Gregg C. Sindici, Reeve J. Jacques, San Diego, Cal., argued for defendants-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California. Before CHOY and SNEED, Circuit Judges, and CRARY, * District Judge. CHOY, Circuit Judge: 1 Ronald Warren Briley appeals from the dismissal of his action for damages brought under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1985(3). For the reasons stated below, we affirm in part, and vacate and remand in part. Facts and Proceedings Below 2 In 1960, Briley, a first offender, was arrested and charged in a California grand jury indictment with child molestation. He alleges that, pursuant to a "plea bargain" entered into with the district attorney's office, he was allowed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.