Evelyn Elliott and Benito Molina, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Caspar W. Weinberger, Individually and in His Capacity as Secretary, United States Department of Health, Education and Welfare, and Sung Dai Seu, Individually and in His Capacity as Pacific Area Manager, Social Security Administration, Department of Health, Education and Welfare, Fannie Buffington and Frances Biner, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Caspar W. Weinberger, Individually and in His Capacity as Secretary of the Department of Health, Education and Welfare

Good Law
564 F.2d 1219
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 15, 197774-1611California10,164 words

Opinion

Opinion

564 F.2d 1219 Evelyn ELLIOTT and Benito Molina, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Caspar W. WEINBERGER, Individually and in his capacity as Secretary, United States Department of Health, Education and Welfare, and Sung Dai Seu, Individually and in his capacity as Pacific Area Manager, Social Security Administration, Department of Health, Education and Welfare, Defendants-Appellants. Fannie BUFFINGTON and Frances Biner, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Caspar W. WEINBERGER, Individually and in his capacity as Secretary of the Department of Health, Education and Welfare, Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 74-1611, 74-3118. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. July 1, 1977. Rehearing and Rehearing In Banc Denied Dec. 15, 1977. 1 Robert E. Kopp and Robert S. Greenspan, argued, Civil Div., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., for defendants-appellants. 2 Stanley E. Levin, argued, Paul D. Alston, Legal Aid Society of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii, for Evelyn Elliott et al. 3 Jeff Spence, argued, Evergreen Legal Services, Seattle, Wash., for Fannie Buffington et al. 4 Before BROWNING…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.