Evergreen Helicopters, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

Good Law
564 F.2d 1293·97 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2327·1977 U.S. App. LEXIS 5966
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 21, 197776-1904California142 words

Opinion

The Board’s Decision and Order is reported at 223 N.L.R.B. 317 (1976). The employer has filed a Petition to Review the Board’s Order, and the Board cross-applies for the Order’s enforcement.

The facts giving rise to the controversy are fully set forth in the Decision of the Administrative Law Judge, included as a portion of the Board’s Decision and Order. The legal conclusions of the Administrative Law Judge, adopted by the Board, with two modifications not here material, appear in the Board’s Decision and Order, supra, at 320.

While the employer’s arguments are persuasive, we are not persuaded that the Board’s Order should be disturbed. In United Ass’n of Journeymen & A., etc. v. N.L.R.B., 553 F.2d 1202, 1205 (9th Cir. 1977), we wrote:

The employers’ Petition to Review is rejected, and, upon the Board’s cross-application, the Board’s Order will be

ENFORCED.