Bong Soo Lee v. Pacific Far East Line, Inc.

Good Law
566 F.2d 65·1978 A.M.C. 663·1977 U.S. App. LEXIS 5571
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 19, 197776-1800California1,493 words

Opinion

Opinion

Byrne, J.

Appellee Lee brought this action to recover for personal injuries sustained while working as a standby maintenance man on appellant’s vessel. The case was presented to the jury on the theories of both negligence under the Jones Act, 46 U.S.C. § 688 , and unseaworthiness under general maritime law.

The jury returned a general verdict in favor of appellee in the amount of $48,300. Appellant’s post-trial motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, or, in the alternative, for a new trial, was denied.

Appellant appeals on the grounds that: (1) the evidence was insufficient to support the general verdict on the ground of unseaworthiness; (2) the jury was improperly instructed as to Lee’s status as a “member of the crew” under the Jones Act and as a result any verdict based upon negligence would be improper; and (3) assuming the challenged instruction was correct, the evidence was insufficient to support the general verdict on the ground of negligence.

Appellee is a seaman with some twenty years of experience as a ship’s refrigerator maintenance man (reefer). On April 12, 1972, he was dispatched by the union as a “standby reefer” aboard the S.S. Monterey, owned by appellant and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.