United States v. Boyer Alfredo Bracy, United States of America v. Sondra Denise Martin, United States of America v. Brenda Bracy

Good Law
566 F.2d 649·1977 U.S. App. LEXIS 5488
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 23, 197776-3416, 76-3289 and 76-3325California5,127 words

Opinion

Opinion

Kilkenny, J.

Appellants, together with three others [Stephanie Maria Gurley, Juanita Louise Kendricks, and Jerry Word], were indicted, tried and convicted in a jury trial of: (1) conspiracy to illegally import a controlled substance [heroin and cocaine] in violation of Title 21 U.S.C. § 963 ; (2) illegal importation of a controlled substance [5.5 pounds of heroin] in violation of Title 21 U.S.C. §§ 952 , 960 and 963; (3) illegal importation of a controlled substance with intent to distribute [heroin and cocaine] in violation of Title 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 (a)(1) and 846; (4) knowingly and intentionally possessing with intention to distribute approximately 5.5 pounds of heroin, a controlled substance, in violation of Title 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1).

The indictment before us, which was returned on June 30,1976, superseded a previous indictment which was returned on April 28th of the same year. James Howard Porter [Porter], who later testified for the government, was named in the June 30th indictment as an unindicted coconspirator. Boyer Alfredo Bracy [A. Bracy], Sondra Denise Martin [Martin], and Brenda Bracy [B. Bracy] appeal. We affirm.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

The incidents upon which the counts in the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.