Rocha

United States v. Rocha

Good Law
598 F.3d 1144·2010 WL 1006501·2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 5603
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 18, 201008-50175California6,468 words

Opinion

Opinion

Bybee, J.

After participating in a brawl in a federal correctional facility that resulted in the death of a fellow inmate, Victor Rocha was convicted on two counts: (1) assault committed by means of force likely to produce great bodily injury under California Penal Code § 245, as assimilated into federal law by the Assimilated Crimes Act, 18 U.S.C. § 13 ; (2) assault with a dangerous weapon under the federal assault statute, 18 U.S.C. § 113 (a)(3). Rocha appeals both convictions, arguing, first, that the Assimilated Crimes Act did not properly assimilate the California statute and, second, that there was insufficient evidence supporting his conviction of assault with a dangerous weapon. We are compelled to agree, and we conclude that the federal assault statute precludes application of California Penal Code § 245 and that the evidence presented to the jury that Rocha used his bare hands to perpetrate the assault cannot support a conviction under the federal assault statute for assault with a dangerous weapon. We reverse his convictions.

I

On the evening of April 11, 2005, Victor Rocha was ironing clothes on the first floor of a prison block in the United States Penitentiary in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.