Rawls v. United States

Good Law
566 F.2d 1373·1978 U.S. App. LEXIS 13167
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 6, 197876-1604California1,664 words

Opinion

Opinion

566 F.2d 1373 Edith RAWLS, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of M. D. Rawls, Deceased, and Emma Mae Cox, a widow, Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America, Rogers G. Morton, Secretary of the Department of the Interior of the United States of America, Earl L. Butz, Secretary of the Department of Agriculture of the United States of America, and the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company, a Kansas Corporation, Appellees. Nos. 76-1604 and 76-1123. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Jan. 6, 1978. Phillip E. von Ammon (argued), Fennemore, Craig, and von Ammon & Udall, Phoenix, Ariz., for appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona. Before WRIGHT and WALLACE, Circuit Judges, and GRANT, District Judge. * EUGENE A. WRIGHT, Circuit Judge: 1 This appeal presents issues relating to the validity of seven contiguous mineral claims in the Kaibab National Forest in Arizona. Appellants Rawls and Cox are successors in interest to those who established the claims being challenged by the appellees. Appellants seek reversal of the district court's order affirming a decision of the Secretary of the Interior which held invalid…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.