Tyson

Tyson v. Western Residential CA2/8

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 5, 2016B263967California2,369 words

Opinion

Opinion

Rubin, J.

Filed 7/5/16 Tyson v. Western Residential CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION EIGHT

MAUREEN AMBER TYSON, B263967

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC498660) v.

WESTERN RESIDENTIAL, INC.,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Mark Mooney, Judge. Affirmed.

Haight Brown & Bonesteel, Bruce Cleeland and Vangi M. Johnson for Defendant and Appellant.

Law Office of Ray Newman and Ray Newman; Susan M. Mogilka for Plaintiff and Respondent.

__________________________ After her apartment was burglarized, plaintiff Maureen Tyson brought suit against, among others: (1) Western Residential, Inc., the company responsible for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.