City of Santa Clara, California v. Cecil Andrus, Individually and as Secretary of the Interior, and R. Keith Higginson, Individually and as Commissioner of the Bureau of Reclamation, United States Department of Interior, Cecil Andrus, Individually and as Secretary of the Interior, and R. Keith Higginson, Individually and as Commissioner of the Bureau of Reclamation, United States Department of Interior v. City of Santa Clara, California, Pacific Gas & Electric Company v. City of Santa Clara, California

Good Law
572 F.2d 660
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 4, 197877-1110California11,611 words

Opinion

Opinion

572 F.2d 660 11 ERC 1777 , 8 Envtl. L. Rep. 20 ,313 CITY OF SANTA CLARA, CALIFORNIA, Appellant, v. Cecil ANDRUS, Individually and as Secretary of the Interior, and R. Keith Higginson, Individually and as Commissioner of the Bureau of Reclamation, United States Department of Interior, Appellees. Cecil ANDRUS, Individually and as Secretary of the Interior, and R. Keith Higginson, Individually and as Commissioner of the Bureau of Reclamation, United States Department of Interior, Appellants, v. CITY OF SANTA CLARA, CALIFORNIA, Appellee. PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY, Appellant, v. CITY OF SANTA CLARA, CALIFORNIA, Appellee. Nos. 77-1110, 77-1270, 77-1189 and 76-3670. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Feb. 1, 1978. As Amended on Denial of Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc April 4, 1978. Terry J. Houlihan (argued), San Francisco, Cal., for appellant, cross appellee. Fred Palmer (argued), Washington, D. C., C. Max Vassanelli (argued), of Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., for appellees, cross appellants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. Before DUNIWAY and CARTER, Circuit Judges, and BURNS, * District Judge. DUNIWAY,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.