Berg v. Richmond Unified School District

Good Law
572 F.2d 709·16 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 8287·1978 U.S. App. LEXIS 11921
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 31, 197874-1457California252 words

Opinion

Opinion

572 F.2d 709 16 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 8287 Sonja Lynn BERG, Individually and on behalf of all other female employees of the Richmond Unified School District, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. RICHMOND UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, Richmond Board of Education, and W. W. Snodgrass, Defendants-Appellants. No. 74-1457. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. March 31, 1978. 1 Arthur W. Walenta, Jr. (argued), Martinez, Cal., for defendants-appellants. 2 Mary C. Dunlap (argued), of Davis, Dunlap & Williams, San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee. ORDER 3 Before MERRILL and KOELSCH, Circuit Judges, and SMITH, * District Judge. 4 The judgment of the district court is vacated. This case is remanded for further proceedings which should be sufficient to enable the court: 5 1. To give reconsideration to the sick-pay issue in light of General Electric Co. v. Gilbert, 429 U.S. 125 , 97 S.Ct. 401 , 50 L.Ed.2d 343 (1976), and Nashville Gas Co. v. Satty, 434 U.S. 136 , 98 S.Ct. 347 , 54 L.Ed.2d 356 (1977), including consideration of the question (if it be advanced by Berg) whether the district's policy disallowing sick pay was a pretext for discrimination. 6 2. To give consideration to the question…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.