The Bunker Hill Company v. Environmental Protection Agency

Good Law
572 F.2d 1286·11 ERC (BNA) 1204·7 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20681·1977 U.S. App. LEXIS 5458
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 28, 197775-3670California11,813 words

Opinion

Opinion

Sneed, J.

Petitioner challenges the actions of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in rejecting portions of the State of Idaho’s implementation plan under the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 1857 , et seq. (Supp. 1977), and substituting therefor its own regulations. See 40 Fed.Reg. 53584 (1975). The rejected portions of the Idaho implementation plan deal with the control of sulfur dioxide (S02) from the Idaho plant of petitioner. The petitioner’s challenge relies on several grounds. While we find in favor of the Administrator on various legal and procedural issues, we remand this proceeding to the EPA for further consideration of the technological feasibility of certain modifications of petitioner’s smelter operations which would be required by the substituted regulations.

I.

History of the Case.

Bunker Hill’s Kellogg, Idaho operations include lead and zinc smelters that emit substantial amounts of S02 gas. Some of the S02 gas presently is vented directly to the atmosphere; the remainder is treated in three acid plants — two servicing the zinc operations, and the third handling the lead smelter. There is no dispute that, as presently operated, Bunker Hill’s Idaho plant is not meeting…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.