United States v. Richard Clinton Allsup

Good Law
573 F.2d 1141
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 12, 197877-3237California2,681 words

Opinion

Opinion

Ely, J.

Allsup, a convicted felon, was arrested, pursuant to a federal warrant, in Tucson, Arizona, on October 24, 1976 in connection with two bank robberies. A search of the vehicle in which Allsup was driving at the time of his arrest revealed a quantity of marijuana and a .45 caliber pistol. Allsup was charged by indictment on November 17, 1976 with two counts of bank robbery. He pleaded not guilty; however, before trial, a plea bargain was entered under which Allsup would plead guilty to one count of bank robbery, and the Government would dismiss the other count and attempt to bring about the dismissal of bank robbery charges pending against Allsup in New Mexico and Oklahoma. The Government also represented that if Allsup would plead guilty to the bank robbery count, he would not be prosecuted for possession of marijuana or for the transportation and possession of a gun by a convicted felon. Allsup repudiated the plea bargain before a change of plea was entered. He was subsequently tried and convicted on February 3, 1977 of both charges of bank robbery.

On February 9, 1977 Allsup was charged in an indictment with violations of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922 (g)(1) and 924(a) (transport of a gun in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.