United States v. Coca-Cola Bottling Company of Los Angeles and Arrowhead Puritas Waters, Inc., and Aqua Media, Ltd., and A. M. Liquidating Co.

Good Law
575 F.2d 222
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 18, 197877-2683, 77-2778California4,771 words

Opinion

Opinion

Carter, J.

These are consolidated interlocutory appeals from a preliminary injunction and from an order denying appellants’ motion to dissolve the same injunction. The injunction arose in a suit by the United States against both the buyers and the sellers in a corporate acquisition which is alleged to violate Section 7 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. § 18 . The complaint sought divestiture or rescission of the acquisition as alternative remedies. To preserve the possibility of a decree of rescission at the conclusion of trial, the district court; on motion of the government, issued a preliminary injunction maintaining the status quo pendente lite. The sellers contend on appeal: (1) the remedy of rescission is not legally available to redress violations of Section 7 of the Clayton Act, and (2) even if legally permissible, rescission is precluded by the particular facts of this case. We AFFIRM.

I. FACTS.

A. Background and Parties.

The buyer-defendants below are Coca-Cola Bottling Company of Los Angeles (CCLA) and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Arrowhead Puritas Waters, Inc. (Arrowhead). The seller-defendants, appellants herein, are A. M. Liquidating Company, a closely held California…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.