United States v. Henry James McDonald United States of America v. Marcus T. Baumann, United States of America v. Allan J. Besbris, United States of America v. Hayes G. Stewart

Good Law
576 F.2d 1350
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 7, 197877-2605California5,812 words

Opinion

Opinion

576 F.2d 1350 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Henry James McDONALD, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Marcus T. BAUMANN, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Allan J. BESBRIS, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Hayes G. STEWART, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 77-2605, 77-2702, 77-2677 and 77-2721. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. May 4, 1978. Rehearing Denied in No. 77-2677 June 7, 1978. Jeffrey R. Feller, O. J. Wilkinson, Jr. of Wilkinson & Quarelli, Phoenix, Ariz., Richard A. Johnson, Payson, Ariz., for defendants-appellants. Dale Danneman, Asst. U. S. Atty., Phoenix, Ariz., for plaintiff-appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona. Before WRIGHT and CHOY, Circuit Judges, and POOLE, District Judge. * EUGENE A. WRIGHT, Circuit Judge: 1 An Arizona land fraud scheme which operated from 1967 to 1974 resulted in the conviction of these appellants on counts of mail fraud ( 18 U.S.C. §§ 1341-42 ), interstate transportation of fraudulently obtained property ( 18 U.S.C. § 2314 ), and aiding and abetting…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.