Hubbard v. Hubbard

Good Law
577 F.2d 98·17 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 582·4 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 631·1978 U.S. App. LEXIS 10694
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 15, 197875-3176California728 words

Opinion

Opinion

577 F.2d 98 In the Matter of Gerald L. HUBBARD and Vivian Hubbard, Bankrupt. James E. ALEXANDER, Jewel B. Alexander and Joel Mithers, Trustee in Bankruptcy, Appellants, v. Gerald L. HUBBARD and Vivian Hubbard, Defendants. No. 75-3176. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. June 15, 1978. Walter M. Modler, (argued), Encino, Cal., for appellants. Earle Hagen, (argued), Beverly Hills, Cal., for defendants. On Appeal from the United States District Court For the Central District of California. Before BARNES and HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judges, and NIELSEN, District Judge. * BARNES, Senior Circuit Judge: 1 We find no error and no abuse of discretion on the part of the District Judge, and adopt his opinion appearing in the Clerk's Transcript at pages 45 to 47. 1 2 We affirm the dismissal. APPENDIX 3 In the Matter of GERALD L. HUBBARD and VIVIAN HUBBARD, Bankrupts. 4 JAMES E. ALEXANDER, JEWEL B. ALEXANDER and JOEL MITHERS, 5 Trustee in Bankruptcy, Plaintiffs, 6 vs. 7 GERALD L. HUBBARD and VIVIAN HUBBARD, Defendants. 8 Nos. 74-2870-F, 74-2871-F. 9 United States District Court,C. D. California. 10 Aug. 1, 1975. MEMORANDUM OPINION 11 FERGUSON, District Judge. 12 The plaintiffs in this…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.