United States v. Ernest Nakamura, United States of America v. Earl K. H. Kim, Sr., A/K/A "The Old Man,"

Good Law
577 F.2d 485·1978 U.S. App. LEXIS 10513
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 26, 197876-3704California2,521 words

Opinion

Opinion

577 F.2d 485 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ernest NAKAMURA, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Earl K. H. KIM, Sr., a/k/a "The Old Man," Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 76-3704, 76-3705. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. June 26, 1978. Michael T. I. Kim (argued), Gordon M. Bronson (argued), Honolulu, Hawaii, for defendants-appellants. Michael L. Sterrett, Sp. Atty. of Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., for plaintiff-appellee. Before BROWNING, Chief Judge. The claims of Michael T. Kim and Rodney Kim for compensation under the Criminal Justice Act are denied. This order, the recommendations of the panel, and the reports of the special master shall be published. 1 Before CHAMBERS and ELY, Circuit Judges, and LINDBERG, District Judge. 2 RECOMMENDATIONS OF PANEL ON SPECIAL MASTER'S REPORTS 3 Pursuant to the recommendation of Magistrate Terlizzi, acting as special master, it is the recommendation of the panel that the claim of Michael T. I. Kim, for compensation in the amount of $7,525.10 (Voucher No. 78540), be denied in its entirety. The claim is obviously an imposition on the government. 4 The panel recommends that the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.