Auto, Marine & Specialty Painters Local No. 1176 v. Bay Area Sealers, Inc.

Good Law
577 F.2d 609·99 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2313·1978 U.S. App. LEXIS 10449
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 29, 197877-1908California329 words

Opinion

Opinion

577 F.2d 609 99 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2313 , 84 Lab.Cas. P 10,702 AUTO, MARINE & SPECIALTY PAINTERS LOCAL NO. 1176, Petitioner-Appellant, v. BAY AREA SEALERS, INC., Respondent-Appellee. No. 77-1908. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. June 29, 1978. David A. Rosenfeld, of Van Bourg, Allen, Weinberg, Roger, San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner-appellant. Maureen E. McClain, of Littler, Mendelson, Fastiff & Tichy, San Francisco, Cal., for respondent-appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. Before BROWNING and WRIGHT, Circuit Judges, and KUNZIG, * Judge, U.S. Court of Claims. PER CURIAM: 1 In response to appellant's petition to compel arbitration of certain grievances, appellee stipulated to the initial existence of a collective bargaining agreement between the parties but asserted the agreement had been abandoned because appellant took no action to implement it for over a year despite appellee's overtures. The district court agreed and dismissed the petition. The appellant argues that the defense of abandonment should have been left to the arbitrator. We agree. 2 In Operating Engineers Local 150 v. Flair Builders,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.