United States v. Kathleen Adkins

Good Law
577 F.2d 675·1978 U.S. App. LEXIS 10379
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 3, 197876-3523California786 words

Opinion

Opinion

577 F.2d 675 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kathleen ADKINS, Defendant-Appellant. No. 76-3523. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. July 3, 1978. Irwin H. Schwartz (argued), Seattle, Wash., for defendant-appellant. James R. Moore, Asst. U. S. Atty. (argued), Tacoma, Wash., for plaintiff-appellee. Before WRIGHT, KILKENNY and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. EUGENE A. WRIGHT, Circuit Judge: 1 This appeal was argued on April 11, 1977, and we deferred submission pending Supreme Court action on several cases presenting the question whether writs of habeas corpus ad prosequendum trigger the provisions of the Interstate Agreement on Detainers, to which the United States is a party. 18 U.S.C.App. 2, § 2. The Supreme Court resolved these issues in United States v. Mauro, --- U.S. ----, 98 S.Ct. 1834 , 56 L.Ed.2d 329 (May 23, 1978). The case is submitted now and we remand for further proceedings. 2 On February 17, 1978, Adkins was arrested and charged with violating 18 U.S.C. §§ 472 & 2. She was released on her own recognizance and thereafter confined in a Washington state penal institution to serve a state sentence. 3 A federal grand jury indicted…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.