National Labor Relations Board v. Adrian Belt Company

Good Law
578 F.2d 1304·99 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2503·1978 U.S. App. LEXIS 9938
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 27, 197876-3422California4,736 words

Opinion

Opinion

578 F.2d 1304 99 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2503 , 84 Lab.Cas. P 10,767 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. ADRIAN BELT COMPANY, Hollywood Leather Creations, Harry Goldberg Belt Company, Inc., Jolie Belts, Inc., Mahler Sales Co., Inc. and Patricia Belt Company, Respondents. No. 76-3422. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. July 27, 1978. Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Washington, D. C., for N. L. R. B. Stephen A. Mazurak, of Rexon & Mazurak, Los Angeles, Cal., for respondents. On Application for Enforcement of an Order of The National Labor Relations Board. Before CHAMBERS and HUG, Circuit Judges, and FERGUSON, * District Judge. PER CURIAM: 1 The National Labor Relations Board, pursuant to § 10(e) of the National Labor Relations Act ( 29 U.S.C. § 151 , et seq.), has applied for enforcement of its order ( 224 NLRB No. 167 ) finding that the respondent companies violated §§ 8(a) (5) and (1) of the Act by refusing to bargain with the union 1 which had been certified by the Board as the exclusive bargaining agent for the respondents' employees. This court has jurisdiction over the proceedings because the alleged unfair labor practice…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.