The Sierra Club v. Stanley K. Hathaway

Good Law
579 F.2d 1162·12 ERC (BNA) 1062·12 ERC 1062·25 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 1402·8 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20736
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 11, 197875-3216California3,237 words

Opinion

Opinion

Tang, J.

The Sierra Club and the Oregon High Desert Study Group, both non-profit, environmental organizations, appeal from an order of the district court denying their request for a preliminary injunction. In the court below, appellants sought to prevent the Secretary of the Interior from executing lease agreements that would give private parties the right to explore for and commercially produce geothermal steam and associated geothermal resources in the Alvord Desert Known Geothermal Resource Area (KGRA). Alternatively, in the event the leases had already been executed, the Sierra Club asked the district court to restrain any lessee from undertaking any right or privilege granted by his leases.

The appellants based their complaint on the Secretary of the Interior’s failure to draft an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), as required by the National Environmental Policy Act, 42 U.S.C. § 4321 et seq., prior to the execution of the leases. The Sierra Club has standing under Sierra Club v. Morton, 405 U.S. 727 , 92 S.Ct. 1361 , 31 L.Ed.2d 636 (1972). The district court found that the initial step of the exploration phase, “casual use,” would not significantly affect the environment and thus…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.