Virginia Cain v. Robert McQueen Virginia Cain, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Robert McQueen Defendants-Appellants-Cross-Appellees. Virginia Cain v. Robert McQueen

Good Law
580 F.2d 1001·1978 U.S. App. LEXIS 9386
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 24, 197876-1222California3,170 words

Opinion

Opinion

580 F.2d 1001 Virginia CAIN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert McQUEEN et al., Defendants-Appellants. Virginia CAIN, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant, v. Robert McQUEEN et al., Defendants-Appellants-Cross-Appellees. Virginia CAIN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert McQUEEN et al., Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 76-1222, 76-1387 and 76-1439. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Aug. 24, 1978. Eugene J. Wait, Jr. (argued) of Wait, Shamberger, Georgeson & McQuaid, Reno, Nev., for Robert McQueen et al. Jerry D. Anker (argued), Washington, D. C., for Virginia Cain. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada at Reno. Before TRASK and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges, and GRANT, * District Judge. TRASK, Circuit Judge: 1 This appeal is taken by both plaintiff and defendants from an order of the district court denying defendants' motion to dismiss and granting limited summary judgment to plaintiff. Plaintiff's subsequent motion to amend the limited summary judgment pursuant to Rule 59(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure was denied. 2 Jurisdiction in the district court was based upon 42 U.S.C. § 1983 , 28 U.S.C. § 1331 and 28 U.S.C. § 1343 (3),…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.