Sahara-Tahoe Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board

Good Law
581 F.2d 767·99 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2837·1978 U.S. App. LEXIS 9144
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 8, 197877-2415California2,770 words

Opinion

Opinion

581 F.2d 767 99 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2837 , 84 Lab.Cas. P 10,854 SAHARA-TAHOE CORPORATION, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent, and Hotel-Motel-Restaurant Employees & Bartenders Union, Local 86, Hotel& Restaurant Employees & Bartenders International Union, AFL-CIO, Intervenor. No. 77-2415. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Sept. 8, 1978. William H. Emer (argued), of Parker, Milliken, Clark & O'Hara, Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioner. Joseph Moore (argued), Washington, D. C., for respondent. Geoffrey V. White, Atty. (argued), San Francisco, Cal., for intervenor. PETITION FOR REVIEW OF A DECISION OF THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD AND CROSS-PETITION FOR ENFORCEMENT OF THE ORDER OF THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD Before TUTTLE, * DUNIWAY and WRIGHT, Circuit Judges. TUTTLE, Senior Circuit Judge: 1 Pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 160 (f), Sahara-Tahoe Corporation has petitioned for review of a decision and order of the National Labor Relations Board. 1 The Board has cross-applied for enforcement of its order, and the Hotel-Motel-Restaurant Employees & Bartenders Union, Local 86, has intervened in favor of enforcement. The Board found…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.