Monti v. Department Of Industrial Relations

Good Law
582 F.2d 1226·18 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 8663·26 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 328·1978 U.S. App. LEXIS 8795
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 26, 197877-3731California816 words

Opinion

Opinion

582 F.2d 1226 18 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 8663 Marie Melrose MONTI and California State Employees Association, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Raymond Barrier and Donald Vial, Defendants-Appellees. No. 77-3731. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Sept. 26, 1978. Helen B. Culiner, San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiffs-appellants. Gordon Zane, San Francisco, Cal., for defendants-appellees. Appeal From the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. Before TRASK and SNEED, Circuit Judges, and RICHEY, * District Judge. SNEED, Circuit Judge: 1 Plaintiffs appeal from an order of the district court denying their motion for class certification. In light of the Court's recent decision in Gardner v. Westinghouse Broadcasting Co., --- U.S. ----, 98 S.Ct. 2451 , 57 L.Ed.2d 489 (1978), this court lacks appellate jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (a)(1) to review the class certification denial. Alternatively, plaintiffs seek a writ of mandamus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1651 , to compel the district court to certify the class. The issuance of such…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.