Amfac Mortgage Corporation v. Arizona Mall Of Tempe, Inc.

Good Law
583 F.2d 426
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 3, 197876-1495California5,527 words

Opinion

Opinion

583 F.2d 426 Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,588 AMFAC MORTGAGE CORPORATION, an Oregon Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ARIZONA MALL OF TEMPE, INC., a Minnesota Corporation, Watson, Frederick O., and Watson, Jane Doe, his wife, Ericson, Orrin A., and Ericson, Galoris A., his wife, Watson Construction Company, a Minnesota Corporation, Commercial Union Insurance Company, a Massachusetts Corporation, the Ericson Development Co., a Minnesota Corporation, Defendants-Appellees. No. 76-1495. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Oct. 3, 1978. William S. Hawgood, II (argued), Phoenix, Ariz., for plaintiff-appellant. Joseph E. McGarry, Phoenix, Ariz., P. Michael Whipple (argued), Phoenix, Ariz., Frederick J. Martone (argued), of Jennings, Strouss & Salmon, Phoenix, Ariz., David L. White (argued), Phoenix, Ariz., for defendants-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona. Before WALLACE and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges, and WILLIAMS, * District Judge. J. BLAINE ANDERSON, Circuit Judge: 1 This is yet another attempt to convert the securities laws into something which they are not. The securities laws do not afford general relief when commercial…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.